唐炜臻抗议市选种族歧视：TTC杀了华人(图) - 北美在线 / North America Online News

David Young, Global Link Realty, 416-301-3756

唐炜臻抗议市选种族歧视：TTC杀了华人(图)

【北美在线 NAOL.CA】 2010/10/20 分类：时事供稿：唐炜臻

北美在线(NAOL.CA)：多伦多市长选举只剩下五天时间，夏侯草三问唯一的华裔市长候选人唐炜臻，下面是唐炜臻的回答，他抗议多伦多市选和媒体包含种族歧视。

唐炜臻的竞选标语之一：TTC杀了华人

唐炜臻抗议多伦多市选和媒体包含种族歧视

夏侯草三问唐炜臻：

1，刚才CP24电视市长候选人答辩，你唐炜臻怎么没有去？

2，作为华裔市长候选人，你有何措施帮助华裔提高他们的收入或工资？

3，如果抛开你自己，你会在其他今晚出席的三个候选人中选哪一个？

唐炜臻回复

三个问题问得好，证明您在动脑筋，希望大家跟您学习。

第一个问题：是问题的关键，竞选是权利和利益的竞争，话语权和决策权，是政治问题，竞选系统和过程从来就不是公平的，特别是媒体是利益集团控制和选择的，西方的政治看起来公平，公开，透明的，明眼人一看就清楚，前两位是是多伦多两大势力的代表，其他人都是陪衬，配角，演戏，做给大家看的，一般情况是不会让我们这些有色人种进入大众视野的，只有我们这些有色人种有了坚强的领导，需要伟大的领袖，广大人民群众的支持，强大的声势才有可能跻身其中争取自己的权力和利益，我们离有资格和能力争取自己的权力和利益，维护自己的权力和利益还有很大的距离，这是第一步，我们榜上有名了，我们来了，填补了一个空白，让我们华人有选举的意义和机会。也让主流看到华人的出现在榜上，不可轻视的力量。

第二个问题是为什么华人要选我的核心问题，他们需要一个有能力的人作为他们的代表，也是带头人，这个人必须有政治头脑，政治能力和经济能力，首先要能解决华人的问题，提高华人的社会地位，华人的问题就是大家的问题，整个社会的问题，只有能够解决华人问题，才能解决整个城市和社会问题。目前政客的能力和权力是有限的，都是现有体系和利益集团控制的，为华人争取权力和利益，为新移民争取权力和利益需要很大的努力和长时间，一百多年华人没有人在这方面努力，没有极大的努力，今天我看到这个机会开了一个头，对于华人的经济对我是有想法和能力的，可以利用中西方的各种优势，取长补短，除了桥梁作用，更可发挥主导作用，利用中西方文化和政治的特点和这里政治环境，创新发展，做一个示范作用，为多伦多提供一个新的模式和选择。要知道我是有政治和经济头脑的，我现在受到的政治迫害，经济和法律借口，所以，不能让他们得逞。他们利用我们自己的人搞我们自己，渔翁得利的办法。我需要政治，经济，文化全面发展，独立性和自主性。有自己的政治家，企业家，司法权，有学历，专业，资格的认证，不受语言限制，华人服务华人天经地义，充分发挥华人和新移民的作用。提高政治地位才有机会提高经济地位和收入。

第三个问题是我来加拿大二十年，从来没有参加市选投票，要投我只投华人和代表我们的利益的新移民，绝不投资福特和史振明，或者其他人。我参加过大选投票，开始觉得有很多议员朋友，这次，我才发现，白人除了笑脸，没有内容，有事的时候找他们一点用都没有，必须有他们的人找他们才管用。

大家应该牢记竞选是集体的权力和利益，是政治，是大家的社会地位，觉悟，讲究出身和来源的，立场和观点的。

不能把自己卖了给别人数钱的永远发生，不要老是让当受骗,把自己的权力和利益给别人，自己却不知道。

Toronto -- Chinese Canadian citizen Weizhen Tang claims that the municipal election system and some members of the local media are racist.

The media selects the `top` candidates in the mayoralty campaign, Tang states. And they are interestingly all white faces. But there is little coverage of the Chinese nor other coloured candidates in the mayoralty and councillor races. Yet, the second most spoken language in Toronto now, is Chinese, according to the official Canadian government census.

Tang holds up his fingers, counting off his checklist, The media identify George Smitherman as the early leader of mayoralty race. But he oversaw the ehealth scandal that saw the loss of $1 Billion. But media is happy to give this candidate lots of media coverage as the `leading candidate.`

Though media identify Rob Ford as buffoon and fool, they give him lots of coverage.

Councillor Joe Pantalone and Councillor Giambrone are given lots of media, as `leading candidates,` even though they are known as top supporters and followers of the Mayor David Miller policies and regime, which is totally discredited. Miller`s policies are so bad, the man is not even running for re-election. Yet his chosen `golden boys` get media, media.

But Chinese and coloured persons like me, we are labelled fringe and denied media coverage.... As you know, if you get media coverage, you are seen as more respectable, serious candidate contender! And then you get more coverage, and are seen to be more respectable, serious candidate... You see, the circle. Tang shakes his head. But it takes the initial media coverage. and I have to say out loud, that I fear that many Chinese and visible minority candidates don`t seem to get the coverage.... The coverage goes to the `top` contender... who is made `top contender` because he gets the media coverage, you see!

Interesting, that Rob Ford just wrote a letter supporting Rocco Achampong being included in the CP24 mayoralty debate. For wrote this,

These televised debates are the only way for Mayoral candidates to get the kind of coverage necessary to put them in the running for Mayor, and I believe that since we had 6 people in the debates earlier, we should continue to have 6 candidates with Rocco Achampong joining us at the table.

So Mr Rob accepts that media coverage is key to a successful mayoralty and councillor campaign. But why Mr Achampong? Why not me, or someone else? Several others? How does media pick? Education? Polls of name recognition? I have higher name recognition that most? I have been scientist. I am the only candidate to personally raise $65 Million? Or, is the sad truth, that some media pick the candidates on the basis of skin colour?

Weizhen Tang is hoping the voters of Toronto, Canada, hand him the key to the city. Tang is a candidate for Mayor. But Tang, the Chinese Warren Buffett, is accused of organizing ponzi schemes, that could hand him 60 years in jail, instead. Ironically, Tang appears in court on October 27, a few days after the October 25 election, that theoretically could make him Mayor of Toronto. Yet he hopes to help bring awareness to the good peoples of Toronto, that there is great injustice and fraud to the peoples of Toronto by tainted political and corporate leaders, and a corrupted financial system.

To get other interesting and news-breaking stories about Weizhen Tang, go to:

http://weizhentang.wordpress.com